MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2936557752 · doi:10.1353/jcr.2016.0006

The Resurrected Skeleton: From Zhuangzi to Lu Xun by Wilt L. Idema (review)

2016· article· en· W2936557752 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chinese Religions · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChinese history and philosophy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonasticismBuddhismMythologyNarrativeAnecdoteReading (process)HistoryPhilosophyClassicsTheologyLiteratureArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seven Samurai), and Song dynasty (960-1279) Chinese Chan exegete, Dahui Zonggao 大慧宗杲 (1089-1163). Only in chapter 5 (“Monastic Transmission: Cases Reflecting Mythology, Monasticism, and Succession,” pp. 129-159) does Heine’s close reading of cases such as no. 11 from the Gateless Gate (in the section on “Monasticism: Enforcing Rules and Regulations,” pp. 142-144) fail to reinforce his own narrative of the institutional side of Zen (e.g., Pure Rules [qinggui, shingi 清規] and monastic transmission with emphasis upon selection of abbots (pp. 131-134). Perhaps because kōans are not necessarily the best source to inform the reader about Chan/Sŏn/Zen monasticism, or because Heine’s apparent preoccupation with cases ascribed to Zhaozhou 趙州 [Congshen 從諗] (778-897) does not prove to be instructive on the topic at hand, this chapter speaks to the broader contribution of the volume: this book is about kōans and how Heine reads them. This book ought to be read in an undergraduate or graduate course alongside John McRae’s Seeing Through Zen: Encounter, Transformation, and Genealogy in Chinese Chan Buddhism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003), because McRae’s work contrasts with Heine’s obvious focus on kōans alone. GEORGE A. KEYWORTH University of Saskatchewan WILT L. IDEMA, The Resurrected Skeleton: From Zhuangzi to Lu Xun. New York: Columbia University Press, 2014. x, 334 pp. US$50, £34.50 (hb). ISBN 978-0-231-16504-4 Since the 1980s, the study of the Zhuangzi 莊子 has received heightened attention in the English-speaking academic world. In the last 35 years, various scholars tried to uncover its core philosophical claims, publishing several edited volumes, monographs , and a myriad of articles on Master Zhuang’s writings. The majority of scholarly interpretations, however, frequently reduced the text to matters of epistemology and language while largely ignoring its profound cultural impact over the last two millennia. Consequently, academics rarely engaged with the vast array of religious, literary, dramatic, sonic, and artistic productions inspired and influenced by the Zhuangzi and its quirky anecdotes. In his new book The Resurrected Skeleton: From Zhuangzi to Lu Xun, Wilt Idema clearly breaks with this tradition offering a fresh look on the Daoist classic. Instead of focusing on excavating an authentic meaning behind the “original” text, he discusses and translates several cultural products containing adaptations of a theme that at least partially originated from the extant Zhuangzi: the famous story of Master Zhuang encountering a skull from the “Perfect Happiness” (“Zhile” 至樂) chapter. Wilt Idema’s translating journey of this Chinese vanitas trope leads the reader through a variety of genres ranging from its earliest accounts in rhapsodies (fu 賦) from the Han 漢 (206 BCE – 220 CE) and early Six Dynasties period (220–589), over narrative ballads (daoqing 道情), plays (zaju 雜劇), youth books (zidishu 子 弟書), precious scrolls (baojuan 寶卷), song lyrics and appended poems from the Ming 明 (1368–1644) and Qing 清 dynasties (1644–1911), to Lu Xun’s 魯迅 (1881-1936) modern parody titled “Raising the Dead” (“Qisi” 起死). In so doing, 84 BOOK REVIEWS Idema’s selection of texts mainly focuses on cultural products from the Ming dynasty, a vivid time period of the Zhuangzi’s reception that had largely been ignored in Western academic writings. He effectively shifts the vista from a fixation on Master Zhuang’s thoughts to the text’s later reworkings, highlighting the fact that there is a vast corpus of materials related to the tremendous cultural field attributed to Zhuang Zhou 莊周 that has been largely untouched by Western scholarship. For that reason, his newest addition to his vast œuvre of translations of Chinese dramatic plays and legendary lore offers a valuable opportunity for specialists and students alike to engage with an under-represented side of the Zhuangzi’s long reception history. In the “Introduction,” Wilt Idema convincingly reconstructs how the translated cultural products included in his anthology reflect various developmental stages of the vanitas trope associated with the Zhuangzi. He demonstrates that the “Zhile” anecdote, in which Zhuang Zhou during a dream episode encounters a skull explicating the joys of being dead, transformed into a story about the resurrection of a full-fledged skeleton by the wayside sometime between the twelfth and the sixteenth century. He traces this development back to...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.612

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it