Real-Time Detection of Acute Cognitive Stress Using a Convolutional Neural Network From Electrocardiographic Signal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
As stress is related to many mental and physical health problems, monitoring stress and its management is getting increasingly important in modern societies. Because of the advantage of convolutional neural network (CNN) in automatic feature learning, this study is proposed to use CNN to achieve accurate and fast detection of acute cognitive stress from heart rate variability (HRV). The traditional mental arithmetic calculation was adopted as the stressor for a total of twenty participants, during which one-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was acquired. Six conventional HRV methods for inferring cognitive stress were extracted from the ECG signals, and their performance in identifying acute cognitive stress was compared with the proposed CNN-based method. The experimental results showed that with a super-short (10 s) time window, the detection error rate of CNN was 17.3%, which is significantly better than the performance of all six conventional HRV methods (> 7.2%, p <; 0.01). Further analysis showed that the improvement achieved by the proposed CNN methods mainly came from the decrease in false stress sample detection. This study demonstrated the possibility of super-short windows and the advantage of CNN on acute cognitive stress detection. Its outcome would benefit practical applications of real-time stress detection via HRV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".