MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2938639026 · doi:10.1049/iet-cta.2018.6236

Parameter estimation of Markov‐switching Hammerstein systems using the variational Bayesian approach

2019· article· en· W2938639026 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Control Theory and Applications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Bayesian probabilityMarkov chainComputer scienceMathematicsMarkov processEstimationMathematical optimizationArtificial intelligenceEngineeringStatisticsMachine learningControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Parameter estimation of Markov‐switching Hammerstein systems is presented in this study. The random switching mode is described by a hidden Markov model. An input non‐linear controlled autoregressive Hammerstein model is applied to describe the dynamic process of each local model. By applying the decomposition technique to the non‐linear mapping of the input signal, each local model is written as a linear‐in‐parameter form. The variational Bayesian approach is applied to identify the switched Markov Hammerstein models. Both the discrete‐valued switching mode state and the unknown parameters in each local model are estimated. Moreover, instead of the point estimation, posterior distributions of unknown parameters for each local model are obtained. Numerical simulation examples and a hybrid tank experiment are presented to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.968
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it