MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939732444 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2019.8682498

A Recursive Least-squares Algorithm Based on the Nearest Kronecker Product Decomposition

2019· article· en· W2939732444 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKronecker productAlgorithmFinite impulse responseRecursive least squares filterAdaptive filterComputer scienceRate of convergenceImpulse responseDimension (graph theory)System identificationConvergence (economics)Context (archaeology)Kronecker deltaMathematicsKey (lock)Data modeling

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The recursive least-squares (RLS) adaptive filter is an appealing choice in system identification problems, mainly due to its fast convergence rate. However, this algorithm is computationally very complex, which may make it useless for the identification of high length impulse responses, like in echo cancellation. In this paper, we focus on a new approach to improve the efficiency of the RLS algorithm. The basic idea is to exploit the impulse response decomposition based on the nearest Kronecker product and low-rank approximation. Thus, a high-dimension system identification problem is reformulated in terms of low-dimension problems, which are tensorized together. Simulations performed in the context of echo cancellation indicate the good performance of the RLS algorithm based on this approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.471

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207