MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2939933176 · doi:10.22587/ajbas.2018.12.7.14

Control of Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer, 1797) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) by gamma radiation

2018· article· en· W2939933176 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paula Bergamin Arthur, A.L.C.H. Villavicencio, R. Hirakawa Andre, Rodrigo Rossi, Valter Arthur

Bibliographic record

VenueAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect behavior and control techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyToxicologyZoology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Worldwide the loss of stored grain is a problem of economic order in importance, in view of the concern of the increased supply of food for a world population increasingly expanding.Associated with this fact, there is the problem of nutritional deficiency due to lack of protein, especially for the less privileged populations in the resources of a country.This lack could be met by adequate supply of grain produced, requiring for it, a s ystem that provides optimum grain storage conditions in securing the quality until the time of consumption.The use of radiation in stored grain can solve the problem of the losses in these products, as not induce resistance of insects and leaves no toxic residue to the consumer, being considered an effective and safe method (Arthur et al., 2012;Arthur et al., 2015).The first use of ionizing radiation on insects was performed by Hunter, (1912) when irradiated Sitophilus oryzae with X-ray, but did not get satisfactory results.Promising results were obtained only by Runner, (1916) that used X-rays to control Lasioderma serricorne, tobacco plague stored.From 1950 there was a major breakthrough in this type of research.Some factors such as the discovery of resistance to certain pests to chemicals, biological imbalance and toxicological problems caused by these products, contributed to this advance.Irradiation of the stored products can solve these types of problems, since it does not induce the emergence of resistance nor residues (Hossain, Brower and Tilton, 1972;Arthur, 2012, Arthur, 1997).Some control measures are adopted to solve the damage and losses caused by insects such as good storage practices, monitoring of pests and chemical treatment, this in turn end up causing some damage, besides the resistance of insects to the active ingredients used in composition of chemicals, and because of these problems, there is a need for more effective methods of control at low cost.Irradiation by numerous factors has been showed as the best solution to control pests (Arthur, 2012;Arthur, Machi and Mastrangelo, 2015;Follett et al., 2013, Hallman, 2013).Others authors studied the gamma radiation effects in various species and phases.In Callosobruchus chinensis (L.), in prelarvae and pupae occur 100% of mortality in larvae at dose of 160 Gy, while pupae were fully killed under dose of 320 Gy (Huqueand Khan, 1969, Ruapongas, 1966).To other pests Banhan (1962) observed that doses of 80 to 100 Gy taken Tribolium confusum higher adult mortality.Nair and Subramanyan, (1963) founded in Tribolium.castaneum, doses ranging from 20 to 50 Gy that decreased the fertility adults.Research on this subject has been increasingly pronounced, thus, in order to clarify the advantages of this method and the benefits it provides in raising food for the population, being that recent years has been given greater attention by governments and private companies.The disinfestation of grain consists of a physical control method, inhibiting reproduction of insects or even killing him.However, for such control is of prime importance to know the lethal doses of ionizing radiation for the different stages of the life cycle of the pest, as the radiosensitivity varies according to several factors, including the stage of development (Arthur et al., 2012, Arthur et al., 2015).The postharvest in phytosanitary irradiation is growing in commercial application and offers some advantages compared with other treatments for the control of quarantine pests on exported commodities.The Irradiation takes less time than fumigation and leaves no undesirable residues, while being at least as effective as any other existing method insect and mite control.Also, while the development of resistance to insecticides and acaricides is a growing problem, resistance to irradiation has never arisen in arthropods (Tilton and Burditt, 1983, Byrne, 1996).The use of methyl bromide as a fumigant to protect commodities is being eliminated; indeed the 1997 Montreal Protocol Agreement stipulated that methyl bromide usage would be completely phased out by 2005 in developed countries and by 2015 in developing countries (UNEP 2009).Nevertheless, certain uses of methyl bromide are exempt from phase-out, and these include the strictly regulated quarantine and pre shipment applications (Heather and Hallman 2008).Arthur et al., (1994) irradiated adults of Sitophilus granarius in wheat grains at doses of 50 to 150 Gy.The authors concluded that there was a significant reduction in the longevity of irradiated adults and absence of insects emerged from the dose of 60 Gy.Remember that a sterile population is an extinct population since there is no introduction of new fertile individuals, therefore mass of grain will be protected and this method of quarantine protection against S. granarius is feasible and recommendable.Arthur, (1974) also irradiated with increasing doses of gamma radiation, pupae of Tribolium castaneum aged from 1 to 5 days and concluded that the lethal dose was 46 krad and the sterilizing of 15 krad.The authors concluded that the dose of AbstractThe aim of the experiment was to determine the sterilizing dose from ionizing radiation by cobalt-60 to Alphitobius diaperinus (Panzer, 1797)(Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) in peanuts.The study was conducted in the laboratory of Radiobiology and Environment of the Center for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture -CENA / USP at Piracicaba, SP -Brazil.Peanuts samples infested with adults of A. diaperinus with 8 treatments and 5 repetitions were used.Each repetition consisted of 20 adults, a total of 100 individuals per treatment.The samples were irradiated in doses of 0 (control), 25, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150 and 175 Gy, in a source of cobalt-60, Gammacell-220 type, with a rate dose of 381Gy / h.The experiment was conducted in a room with a relative of 25 ± 5 ° C temperatures and humidity of 70 ± 5%.After 50 days of irradiation process was evaluated of the number of emerged insects in each treatment.The results show that the sterilizing doses in F1 and F2 generations respectively were: 150 Gy and 125 Gy.The dose of 150 Gy of gamma radiation can be used in both generations as phytosanitary treatment to control of A. diaperinus infested peanuts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCESSame topicInsect behavior and control techniquesFrench-language works237,207