MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2940466158 · doi:10.1109/tvlsi.2019.2908964

Hardware Trojan Detection Using Reconfigurable Assertion Checkers

2019· article· en· W2940466158 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHardware TrojanTrojanAssertionEmbedded systemComputer scienceMicrocontrollerSystem on a chipComputer hardwareComputer securityProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, reconfigurable assertion checkers (RACs) are proposed for hardware Trojan detection on a system-on-chip (SoC). A modified circuit design flow to incorporate RACs into an SoC is proposed. A flexible RAC architecture is developed to implement different types of assertions. Case studies of mapping a simple assertion checker into RAC are given. The utilization of RAC in detecting hardware Trojans is demonstrated in two advanced microcontroller bus architecture (AMBA) case studies: a denial-of-service (DoS) hardware Trojan and a leak of information hardware Trojan. In both cases, our proposed RAC was able to detect the hardware Trojan whenever the Trojan was triggered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.840
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.233
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it