Collective Emotions and Victimization in the World War Two Film<i>Der Untergang</i>(2004)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
After Bernd Eichinger's blockbuster war movie Der Untergang was released in 2004, it received many positive reviews by North‐American critics. But the biggest success of this film is still on‐going: more than a decade later, Der Untergang has become canonized in a way similar to the Oscar winning GDR surveillance movie Das Leben der Anderen (2006). Today, Der Untergang is one of the classic films to teach the “Third Reich” in many German courses. While many scholarly studies have been written about Der Untergang , they do not use the most promising methodological approach that can help us to understand how this film manages to be so suggestive. This paper's thesis is that it is crucial to take a closer look at the emotive strategies used in Der Untergang . Emotion research is the key to understanding the film's transnational success.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it