MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2941402238

Review: Managed Annihilation: An Unnatural History of the Newfoundland Cod Collapse

2011· article· en· W2941402238 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Green Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine and fisheries research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFishingFisherySubsistence agricultureOverfishingCod fisheriesFisheries managementCapelinEconomic historyFish <Actinopterygii>GeographyEconomicsArchaeologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Review: Managed Annihilation: An Unnatural History of the Newfoundland Cod Collapse By Dean Bavington Bavington, Dean. Managed Annihilation: An Unnatural History of the Newfoundland Cod Collapse. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press, 2011. 186pp. ISBN 9780774817486. US $35.95, paper, acid-free. Dean Bavington's Managed Annihilation is a cautionary tale for our times. Western style management, mediated by state bureaucracies and economic rationality, may administer natural resources into oblivion. Bavington argues that this is precisely what happened with the Newfoundland cod fisheries collapse, made official in 1992. The basic problems were these: fisheries managers did not understand the behavior of fish, they did not understand the behavior of humans, and they did not understand the relationships between fish and humans. Yet they continued to manage as if they did. Bavington traces part of the history of cod fishing in Newfoundland and describes the shifts from subsistence fishing to small scale mercantilism to market-based fishing economies and large scale exploitation. Over a 400 year period of small scale fishing, fishermen caught about 50 million ton of cod. Over a 90 year period of industrial fishing leading up to the collapse of the fishery, fishermen harvested the same tonnage. Unlike subsistence fishermen, however, industrial harvesters fished year round and targeted all cod, including spawning and pre-spawning fish, as well as cod's prey such as squid and capelin. Between 1960 and 1992, 99.9 percent of the cod's spawning biomass had been eliminated. It is difficult to imagine a starker instance of managerial failure. The primary focus of Managed Annihilation is on the conceptual and practical inconsistencies of modern industrial fishing, which was ushered into being with the help of fisheries science, new politically expedient management regimes, and emerging global economies. Fisheries science gave us the idea maximum sustainable yield, based on population estimates and models of population structure that were, simply, wrong. These estimates and models, however, provided managers with the illusion that they could manage cod population fluctuations and harvest sustainably. Economics gave us the idea of maximum economic yield, based on the assumption that industrial fishermen were rational economic actors intent on maximizing profits, but not to the extent of catching all of the available fish and thereby undermining their own industry. This idea was also wrong. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.700
Threshold uncertainty score0.985

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it