Charging and heating processes of dust particles in an electron cyclotron resonance plasma
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Incandescent dust particles are observed with the naked eye in plasmas excited at the electron cyclotron resonance produced in pure acetylene. To investigate the heating mechanisms involved and their potential impact on the dust particle charge, as a first approach, a probe is used to measure the floating potential and to estimate the temperature reached by the material. Both highly depend on the position in the magnetic field and on the plasma conditions (pressure and gas, namely argon or helium). Numerical simulations based on the balance of the currents and of the heat fluxes on the probe emphasize a key role of primary electrons: they are responsible for the very negative floating potential as well as for the high probe temperature. Numerical simulations are also adapted to the case of a dust particle in a non-reactive plasma. However, even it can reach temperatures higher than 1600 K, the dust particle remains negatively charged.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it