An Approach to Estimate the Outstanding Loss Reserve of the Non-Life Insurer Under Solvency- II Regime
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper studies the reserve risk estimation requirement under the Solvency-II regime that came into effect in the European insurance sector in January 2016. In particular, it shows how the outstanding loss of a non-life insurer can be estimated under this regime. This regime totally replaces the traditional approaches of providing standard deviations of the liabilities over their full run-off. The requirement under this regime is that each risk shall be calibrated using a value-at-risk measure with 99.5 percentile confidence level over a single period. In connection with this, a bootstrap framework is used to estimate the uncertainty of loss reserve over the single period time horizon. Two process distributions are used namely Over-dispersed Poisson and Gamma in two separate bootstraps to estimate the uncertainty of loss reserve. Further, a comparison is established in the estimated results and it is found that Over-dispersed Poisson process distribution produces lower prediction errors than the gamma process distribution. Â
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it