Conditional generative adversarial network for 3D rigid‐body motion correction in MRI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Subject motion in MRI remains an unsolved problem; motion during image acquisition may cause blurring and artifacts that severely degrade image quality. In this work, we approach motion correction as an image-to-image translation problem, which refers to the approach of training a deep neural network to predict an image in 1 domain from an image in another domain. Specifically, the purpose of this work was to develop and train a conditional generative adversarial network to predict artifact-free brain images from motion-corrupted data. METHODS: *-weighted, FLASH magnitude, and phase brain images for 53 patients was used to generate complex image data for motion simulation. To simulate rigid motion, rotations and translations were applied to the image data based on randomly generated motion profiles. A conditional generative adversarial network, comprising a generator and discriminator networks, was trained using the motion-corrupted and corresponding ground truth (original) images as training pairs. RESULTS: The images predicted by the conditional generative adversarial network have improved image quality compared to the motion-corrupted images. The mean absolute error between the motion-corrupted and ground-truth images of the test set was 16.4% of the image mean value, whereas the mean absolute error between the conditional generative adversarial network-predicted and ground-truth images was 10.8% The network output also demonstrated improved peak SNR and structural similarity index for all test-set images. CONCLUSION: The images predicted by the conditional generative adversarial network have quantitatively and qualitatively improved image quality compared to the motion-corrupted images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it