LES PARCOURS SCOLAIRES DES JEUNES CANADIENS D’ORIGINE IMMIGRANTE AUX ÉTUDES SUPÉRIEURES : QUI Y ACCÈDE ET COMMENT?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ: Cet article vise à examiner dans quelle mesure les jeunes Canadiens d’origine immigrante font usage des parcours linéaires et non linéaires aux études supérieures. Les résultats obtenus à partir des données tirées du fichier public du ministère de l’Éducation du Québec permettent de dégager les constats suivants. Premièrement, ces jeunes poursuivent les études supérieures par la voie des parcours linéaires dans une proportion plus élevée que leurs pairs dont les parents sont nés au Canada. Deuxièmement, les différences sont nettement plus élevées à l’université qu’au CEGEP1. Troisièmement, il existe des différences significatives importantes parmi les jeunes d’origine immigrante eux-mêmes selon l’origine géographique des parents et selon que l’étudiant est un immigrant de 1e ou de 2e génération.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".