MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2942743310 · doi:10.1590/es0101-73302019181525

LES PARCOURS SCOLAIRES DES JEUNES CANADIENS D’ORIGINE IMMIGRANTE AUX ÉTUDES SUPÉRIEURES : QUI Y ACCÈDE ET COMMENT?

2019· article· fr· W2942743310 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducação & Sociedade · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration and Labor Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ: Cet article vise à examiner dans quelle mesure les jeunes Canadiens d’origine immigrante font usage des parcours linéaires et non linéaires aux études supérieures. Les résultats obtenus à partir des données tirées du fichier public du ministère de l’Éducation du Québec permettent de dégager les constats suivants. Premièrement, ces jeunes poursuivent les études supérieures par la voie des parcours linéaires dans une proportion plus élevée que leurs pairs dont les parents sont nés au Canada. Deuxièmement, les différences sont nettement plus élevées à l’université qu’au CEGEP1. Troisièmement, il existe des différences significatives importantes parmi les jeunes d’origine immigrante eux-mêmes selon l’origine géographique des parents et selon que l’étudiant est un immigrant de 1e ou de 2e génération.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.605
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it