MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943323800 · doi:10.29173/cais352

Online Participation and Information Inclusion – A Study of Internet Users with Vision Impairments

2013· article· fr· W2943323800 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Accessibility for Disabilities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInclusion (mineral)The InternetWeb sitePsychologyHumanitiesSociologyWorld Wide WebSocial psychologyComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our presentation will highlight the need to move beyond Web Accessibility for Internet users with vision impairments to Information Inclusion through facilitation of their online participation and knowledge sharing. Our empirically grounded suggestions emanate from our study of the everyday information practices of sixty residents of Ontario with vision impairments.Cette communication met en évidence la nécessité d'aller au-delà de l'accessibilité sur le web pour les internautes souffrant de troubles de la vision pour privilégier plutôt l'inclusion par l'information au moyen d'une meilleure participation en ligne et du partage des connaissances. Nos suggestions se basent sur des données empiriques provenant de l'analyse des pratiques quotidiennes de soixante résidents ontariens souffrant de troubles de la vision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesScholarly communication
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.048
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it