MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943669549 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2019.8702206

An MRAM-Based Deep In-Memory Architecture for Deep Neural Networks

2019· article· en· W2943669549 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ameya D. Patil, Haocheng Hua, Sujan K. Gonugondla, Mingu Kang, Naresh R. Shanbhag

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsMagnetoresistive random-access memoryComputer scienceCMOSArtificial neural networkDeep learningMNIST databaseComputer architectureArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringRandom access memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an MRAM-based deep in-memory architecture (MRAM-DIMA) to efficiently implement multi-bit matrix vector multiplication for deep neural networks using a standard MRAM bitcell array. The MRAM-DIMA achieves an 4.5 × and 70× lower energy and delay, respectively, compared to a conventional digital MRAM architecture. Behavioral models are developed to estimate the impact of circuit non-idealities, including process variations, on the DNN accuracy. An accuracy drop of ≤ 0.5% (≤ 1%) is observed for LeNet-300-100 on the MNIST dataset (a 9-layer CNN on the CIFAR-10 dataset), while tolerating 24% (12%) variation in cell conductance in a commercial 22 nm CMOS-MRAM process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207