MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943669549 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2019.8702206

An MRAM-Based Deep In-Memory Architecture for Deep Neural Networks

2019· article· en· W2943669549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Memory and Neural Computing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDefense Advanced Research Projects AgencyCanadian Institute for Advanced Research
KeywordsMagnetoresistive random-access memoryComputer scienceCMOSArtificial neural networkDeep learningMNIST databaseComputer architectureArtificial intelligenceElectronic engineeringComputer hardwareEngineeringRandom access memory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an MRAM-based deep in-memory architecture (MRAM-DIMA) to efficiently implement multi-bit matrix vector multiplication for deep neural networks using a standard MRAM bitcell array. The MRAM-DIMA achieves an 4.5 × and 70× lower energy and delay, respectively, compared to a conventional digital MRAM architecture. Behavioral models are developed to estimate the impact of circuit non-idealities, including process variations, on the DNN accuracy. An accuracy drop of ≤ 0.5% (≤ 1%) is observed for LeNet-300-100 on the MNIST dataset (a 9-layer CNN on the CIFAR-10 dataset), while tolerating 24% (12%) variation in cell conductance in a commercial 22 nm CMOS-MRAM process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.490
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Memory and Neural ComputingFrench-language works237,207