Robust Vision-Based Tube Model Predictive Control of Multiple Mobile Robots for Leader–Follower Formation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Generally, vision-based controls use various camera sensors and require camera calibration, while the control performance would degrade due to inaccuracy calibration. Therefore, in this paper, the proposed controller only makes use of the image information from an un-calibrated perspective camera mounted at the follower robot without relative position measurement or any communication among the robots. First, the nominal visual formation kinematic model is developed using the camera models. Then it is redescribed as a quadratic programming (QP) with the specified constraints. A neurodynamic optimization based on primal-dual neural network is utilized to ensure the QP being converged to the exact optimal values. Through two-time-scale neuro-dynamical optimization, the gain scheduling of the ancillary state feedback can be realized so that the state variables are constrained within an invariant designed tube. The experiment results provide the verification for the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it