MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2943946026 · doi:10.5539/enrr.v9n2p61

Natural Ventilation in Isolated Subsurface Structures in the Infrastructure: A Review

2019· review· en· W2943946026 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironment and Natural Resources Research · 2019
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSolar Energy Systems and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsNatural ventilationCover (algebra)Natural (archaeology)Atmosphere (unit)Ventilation (architecture)Air movementWork (physics)Environmental scienceComputer scienceMining engineeringGeologyMechanical engineeringEngineeringMeteorologyGeographyAtmospheric sciences

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The subsurface infrastructure contains many types of structures. Some are networked together in open systems while others are completely independent from each other. This study provides a summary of findings concerning ventilation induced by natural forces from reports published in the literature + additional unreported information concerning isolated subsurface structures. Isolated subsurface structures meet criteria for classification as confined spaces. Isolated subsurface structures experience two-way exchange of the internal atmosphere with the external atmosphere when the manhole cover or access hatch contains one or more openings. This finding is not appreciated by current practitioners of occupational health and safety knowledgeable in the area of confined spaces. Presently identified factors influencing ventilation induced by natural forces include the number/area of openings in the manhole cover, differences in temperature between the interior airspace and the external atmosphere, and air movement along the surface of the ground. Additional factors could include size or number of individual openings, placement of openings in the manhole cover or hatch, shape of the openings, and shape of the path followed during air exchange. In some cases, application of additional analysis provides information contained in the data but not presented in these documents. Demonstrating and understanding the interaction between these factors will enable optimization of design to maximize the rate of air exchange. Optimizing the rate of air exchange is essential to minimizing to the extent possible the risk posed to passersby and to workers engaged in preparation for entry and work inside these structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it