A regularization method for constrained nonlinear least squares
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We propose a regularization method for nonlinear least-squares problems with equality constraints. Our approach is modeled after those of Arreckx and Orban (SIAM J Optim 28(2):1613–1639, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1137/16M1088570 ) and Dehghani et al. (INFOR Inf Syst Oper Res, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.2018.1559428 ) and applies a selective regularization scheme that may be viewed as a reformulation of an augmented Lagrangian. Our formulation avoids the occurrence of the operator $$A(x)^T A(x)$$ , where A is the Jacobian of the nonlinear residual, which typically contributes to the density and ill conditioning of subproblems. Under boundedness of the derivatives, we establish global convergence to a KKT point or a stationary point of an infeasibility measure. If second derivatives are Lipschitz continuous and a second-order sufficient condition is satisfied, we establish superlinear convergence without requiring a constraint qualification to hold. The convergence rate is determined by a Dennis–Moré-type condition. We describe our implementation in the Julia language, which supports multiple floating-point systems. We illustrate a simple progressive scheme to obtain solutions in quadruple precision. Because our approach is similar to applying an SQP method with an exact merit function on a related problem, we show that our implementation compares favorably to IPOPT in IEEE double precision.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it