MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945174178 · doi:10.1113/jp277714

Blunted sympathetic neurovascular transduction during normotensive pregnancy

2019· article· en· W2945174178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physiology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of NewfoundlandWomen and Children’s Health Research InstituteUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsGovernment of CanadaHeart and Stroke Foundation of Canada
KeywordsNeurovascular bundlePregnancyInternal medicineTransduction (biophysics)MedicineEndocrinologyCardiologyNeuroscienceAnatomyBiologyBiophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS: Normotensive pregnancy is associated with elevated sympathetic nervous system activity yet normal or reduced blood pressure. It represents a unique period of apparent healthy sympathetic hyperactivity. The present study models the blood pressure and heart rate (ECG R-R interval) responses to fluctuations in sympathetic nervous system activity aiming to understand neurocardiovascular transduction. The reported data clearly demonstrate that transduction of sympathetic nervous system signalling to systemic cardiovascular outcomes is reduced in normotensive pregnancy. These data are important for understanding how blood pressure regulation adapts during normotensive pregnancy and set the foundation for exploring similar mechanisms in hypertensive pregnancies. ABSTRACT: Previously, we described sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity yet decreased blood pressure responses to stress in normotensive pregnancy. To address the hypothesis that pregnant women have blunted neurocardiovascular transduction we assessed the relationship between spontaneous bursts of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) and fluctuations in mean arterial blood pressure and R-R interval. Resting SNA, blood pressure and ECG were obtained in pregnant (third trimester, n = 18) and non-pregnant (n = 18) women matched for age and pre-/non-pregnant body mass index. Custom software modelled beat-by-beat pressure (photoplethysmography) and R-R interval in relation to sequences of SNA bursts and non-bursts (peroneal microneurography). Sequences were grouped by the number of bursts and non-bursts [singlets, doublets, triplets and quadruplet (four or more)] and mean blood pressure and R-R interval were tracked for 15 subsequent cardiac cycles. Similar sequences were overlaid and averaged. Peak mean pressure in relation to sequences of SNA was reduced in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women (doublets: 1.6 ± 1.1 mmHg vs. 3.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, P < 0.05; triplets: 2.4 ± 1.2 mmHg vs. 3.4 ± 2.1 mmHg, P < 0.05; quadruplets: 3.0 ± 1.0 mmHg vs. 5.5 ± 3.7 mmHg, P < 0.05). The nadir R-R interval following burst sequences was also smaller in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women (singlets: -0.01 ± 0.01 s vs. -0.04 ± 0.04 s, P < 0.05; doublets: -0.02 ± 0.03 s vs. -0.05 ± 0.04 s, P < 0.05; triplets: -0.02 ± 0.01 s vs. -0.07 ± 0.04 s, P < 0.05; quadruplets: -0.01 ± 0.01 s vs. -0.09 ± 0.09 s, P < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the mean arterial pressure and R-R interval responses to non-burst sequences. Our data clearly indicate blunted systemic neurocardiovascular transduction during normotensive pregnancy. We propose that blunted transduction is a positive adaptation protecting pregnant women from the cardiovascular consequences of sympathetic hyperactivity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.769
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it