Blunted sympathetic neurovascular transduction during normotensive pregnancy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
KEY POINTS: Normotensive pregnancy is associated with elevated sympathetic nervous system activity yet normal or reduced blood pressure. It represents a unique period of apparent healthy sympathetic hyperactivity. The present study models the blood pressure and heart rate (ECG R-R interval) responses to fluctuations in sympathetic nervous system activity aiming to understand neurocardiovascular transduction. The reported data clearly demonstrate that transduction of sympathetic nervous system signalling to systemic cardiovascular outcomes is reduced in normotensive pregnancy. These data are important for understanding how blood pressure regulation adapts during normotensive pregnancy and set the foundation for exploring similar mechanisms in hypertensive pregnancies. ABSTRACT: Previously, we described sympathetic nervous system hyperactivity yet decreased blood pressure responses to stress in normotensive pregnancy. To address the hypothesis that pregnant women have blunted neurocardiovascular transduction we assessed the relationship between spontaneous bursts of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) and fluctuations in mean arterial blood pressure and R-R interval. Resting SNA, blood pressure and ECG were obtained in pregnant (third trimester, n = 18) and non-pregnant (n = 18) women matched for age and pre-/non-pregnant body mass index. Custom software modelled beat-by-beat pressure (photoplethysmography) and R-R interval in relation to sequences of SNA bursts and non-bursts (peroneal microneurography). Sequences were grouped by the number of bursts and non-bursts [singlets, doublets, triplets and quadruplet (four or more)] and mean blood pressure and R-R interval were tracked for 15 subsequent cardiac cycles. Similar sequences were overlaid and averaged. Peak mean pressure in relation to sequences of SNA was reduced in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women (doublets: 1.6 ± 1.1 mmHg vs. 3.6 ± 3.1 mmHg, P < 0.05; triplets: 2.4 ± 1.2 mmHg vs. 3.4 ± 2.1 mmHg, P < 0.05; quadruplets: 3.0 ± 1.0 mmHg vs. 5.5 ± 3.7 mmHg, P < 0.05). The nadir R-R interval following burst sequences was also smaller in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women (singlets: -0.01 ± 0.01 s vs. -0.04 ± 0.04 s, P < 0.05; doublets: -0.02 ± 0.03 s vs. -0.05 ± 0.04 s, P < 0.05; triplets: -0.02 ± 0.01 s vs. -0.07 ± 0.04 s, P < 0.05; quadruplets: -0.01 ± 0.01 s vs. -0.09 ± 0.09 s, P < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in the mean arterial pressure and R-R interval responses to non-burst sequences. Our data clearly indicate blunted systemic neurocardiovascular transduction during normotensive pregnancy. We propose that blunted transduction is a positive adaptation protecting pregnant women from the cardiovascular consequences of sympathetic hyperactivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".