MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2945585512 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b00811

Carbonyl Reduction and Biomass: A Case Study of Sustainable Catalysis

2019· article· en· W2945585512 on OpenAlexafffund
Alain Y. Li, Audrey Moores

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCatalysis for Biomass Conversion
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityCentre in Green Chemistry and Catalysis
FundersFonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologiesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsBiomass (ecology)Context (archaeology)CatalysisBiochemical engineeringBenchmark (surveying)Green chemistryProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceChemistryRenewable energyWaste managementNanotechnologyPulp and paper industryOrganic chemistryMaterials scienceEngineeringReaction mechanismEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Catalysis plays a major role at mitigating the environmental impact of the chemical industry, drastically cutting its energy and material consumption. For this Perspective, we have chosen C═O reduction in the context of biomass as a benchmark reaction to introduce and illustrate essential aspects of green catalysis. We first covered the most used C═O hydrogenation substrates made from biomass. Then, we looked at alternative energy sources to convective heating, discussed the use of greener solvents and reductants, and listed a few precious metal-free catalytic systems. Finally, we looked at various hydrogen sources, including biosourced ones. In particular, we emphasized the use of metrics in order to quantify the actual impact of these innovations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations40
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Sustainable Chemistry & EngineeringSame topicCatalysis for Biomass ConversionFrench-language works237,207