MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946266029 · doi:10.1088/2399-6528/ab234d

Non-Equilibrium ϕ<sup>4</sup> theory for networks: towards memory formations with quantum brain dynamics

2019· article· en· W2946266029 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Communications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Thermodynamics and Statistical Mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersUniversity of AlbertaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Health Services
KeywordsQuantum decoherenceStatistical physicsQuantumHomogeneousEntropy (arrow of time)PhysicsScalar fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We investigate the time evolution of quantum fields in neutral scalar ϕ 4 theory for open systems with the central region and the multiple reservoirs (networks) as a toy model of quantum field theory of the brain. First we investigate the Klein–Gordon (KG) equations and the Kadanoff–Baym (KB) equations in open systems in d + 1 dimensions. Next, we introduce the kinetic entropy current and provide the proof of the H-theorem for networks. Finally, we solve the KG and the KB equations numerically in spatially homogeneous systems in 1 + 1 dimensions. We find that decoherence, entropy saturation and chemical equilibration all occur during the time evolution in the networks. We also show how coherent field transfer takes place in the networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.631

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it