MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946350616 · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2019.2911603

Convolutional Neural Networks as Asymmetric Volterra Models Based on Generalized Orthonormal Basis Functions

2019· article· en· W2946350616 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsOrthonormal basisConvolutional neural networkNoise (video)Computer scienceNonlinear systemSystem identificationQuadcopterNonlinear system identificationBasis (linear algebra)Applied mathematicsArtificial neural networkBasis functionDynamical systems theoryVolterra seriesIdentification (biology)Orthogonal functionsAlgorithmArtificial intelligenceMathematicsData modelingMathematical analysisEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a convolutional neural network (CNN) approach to derive Volterra models of dynamical systems based on generalized orthonormal basis function (GOBF)-Volterra. The approach derives the parameters of the model through a CNN and the neural network's learned weights represent the poles of a system. Simulation results show that the parameters of the system can be exactly recovered when no noise is applied. Furthermore, when noise is present, the errors in the parameters are very small for both the linear and nonlinear cases. Finally, the approach is used to identify the model of a quadcopter using data from actual flight tests. Comparisons with previous works demonstrate that CNNs can be satisfactorily used for the identification of dynamical systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it