MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2946903875 · doi:10.1134/s1063776119020201

Relativistic Modeling of Ultra-Short Electron Pulse Propagation

2019· article· en· W2946903875 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGyrotron and Vacuum Electronics Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectronPulse (music)PhysicsSolid-state physicsComputational physicsAtomic physicsQuantum electrodynamicsNuclear physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ultrafast electron microscopy, electron diffraction, electron crystallography, and nanocrystallography methods opened the possibility of studying the coherent structural dynamics of matter. The time resolution of the ultrafast electron microscopy and electron diffraction methods determined by the duration of electron pulses is the key parameter of experimental setups. This paper treats electron pulse dynamics in the field free drift region specifically for applications in atomic imaging. The electron beam is modeled as a system of particles (N) with N = 1000 and N = 10 000 electrons. The beam propagates for a certain period of time (1–4 ns); during its propagation, electron distribution parameters (over coordinates and velocities) are calculated to characterize the temporal profile and uncertainty in the electron wavelength at the sample. The results of applying relativistic dynamic equations show that nonrelativistic results are satisfactorily applicable (with 15 per cent or better accuracy) for modeling short electron pulse elongation and broadening at 30 keV and lower energies. However, the results of such modeling may be significantly in error for intermediate energies (300 keV), and for the fast relativistic beams (3 MeV) they become completely wrong. The relative reduction in Coulomb repulsion effects at higher energies is known, however; we give a comprehensive treatment that allows a quantitative picture. Using high-energy electron pulses results in almost complete elimination of the repulsive Coulomb effect. Dispersion of electron velocities becomes much lower at higher energies. For 3 MeV electrons, electron pulse duration as well as its radius does not noticeably change even after traveling for 4 ns (1.2 m). Even at 300 keV, the pulse duration increase is negligible until 1 ns (0.2 m). A simple mean-field model suggested in [13] has been extended to arbitrarily fast relativistic electron pulses with good correspondence to direct dynamic modeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it