MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947036387 · doi:10.17118/11143/15553

¿Qué es el purismo?

2018· article· es· W2947036387 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marie-Églantine Lescasse

Bibliographic record

VenueCircula · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSwearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesLibrary sciencePhilosophyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Resumen: El presente artculo busca echar luz sobre la mentalidad de los autores castellanos puristas de los siglos XVI y XVII, mediante el anlisis de las representaciones (imgenes, metforas, ideas) asociadas con la lengua bella y pura, en el corpus de elogios de la lengua publicado por Germn Bleiberg en 1951. Nos apoyamos en las teoras antropolgicas de Mary Douglas para mostrar que los puristas llevan a cabo una forma de sacralizacin del idioma. Adems, mostramos que se caracterizan menos por un conjunto de doctrinas explcitas que por un apego sentimental a la lengua materna, un amor superlativo e irracional. Esto se percibe a travs del uso de una retrica hiperblica, as como de las personificaciones femeninas, que erotizan a la lengua.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.077

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.008
Scholarly communication0.0130.009
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0040.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0230.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.371
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCirculaSame topicSwearing, Euphemism, MultilingualismFrench-language works237,207