MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947114704 · doi:10.1386/hosp.9.2.161_1

The ‘McAutocrat of the breakfast-table’: Highland hospitality in nineteenth-century travel writing

2019· article· en· W2947114704 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueHospitality & Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicScottish History and National Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHospitalityTourismProsperityVariety (cybernetics)SociologyTable (database)EconomySocial scienceHistoryPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concept of the tourism imaginary can be employed to illuminate representational histories of the inn and the innkeeper in the nineteenth-century Scottish Highlands. In evaluations of Scottish hospitality, the innkeeper’s relationship to modern tourism culture was appraised in tandem with the wider role of the inn and its local social, cultural and commercial functions. Some commentators critiqued Highland tourism practices as inhospitable, often through caricatures of the miserly innkeeper. Other writers treated Highland inns as indices of local economic prosperity, and the innkeeper as either an upholder of local morality or a victim of economic structures and even climatic conditions. As the tourism sector expanded, a variety of texts positioned inns and innkeepers at the heart of debates over the relationship between Highland culture and practices of commercial hospitality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.527
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it