MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947620516 · doi:10.1109/robosoft.2019.8722756

Tele-Operable Controlling System for Hand Gesture Controlled Soft Robot Actuator

2019· article· en· W2947620516 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 2nd IEEE International Conference on Soft Robotics (RoboSoft) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Automated Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGestureActuatorComputer scienceRobotRobot handArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper focuses on investigating the delays of a tele-operable bilateral system design with a soft actuator. The setup we have used is governed by realizing control signals obtained from hand gestures through the Internet, over a long distance. The control signals are necessary to be received promptly to the controller and lags are important to minimize in establishing real time control of the system. Slave side is a soft actuator made out of an elastomer material which is controlled by pneumatic actuation. Solenoid valves are used to control the actuator. Through out the experimentation, we have assumed the actuator to follow the Neo Hookean (hyper-elastic model) behavior. A data glove is used to realize the bending angle and forces generated during soft grasping by the operator's finger. Then these control signals are transmitted to the slave side using Internet. These signals are used to control the air pressure of the cavities in soft actuator. A closed loop system is established by attaching a flex sensor in the soft actuator. Message Queuing Telemetry Transport (MQTT) server is used to deliver the data packets which has control data. Several experimentations are carried out in different geographical locations to study the behavior and delays associated with the setup. We have mainly encountered delays due to communication (mainly Round Trip Delay Time (RTT)), elastic saturation and minor delays due to various other factors. This paper studies and discusses delays and their possible causes. We have compared the elastic saturation delays obtained by the finite element model and delays measured by experiments. Final results of the study revealed the importance of considering these delay factors in design level to establish real-time control in soft actuator systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it