Separation of Fetal-ECG From Single-Channel Abdominal ECG Using Activation Scaled Non-Negative Matrix Factorization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Performing a fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis, which contains important information about the status of a fetal, can help to detect fetus health even before birth. Since the fetal ECG extracted from the ECG signal recorded from the mother's abdomen, this extraction problem can be seen as a source separation problem, of recovering source signals from signal mixtures. In this paper, a method for separation of fetal ECG from abdominal ECG using activation scaled non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) is proposed. The performance of the proposed method is also compared with independent component analysis. The proposed method is tested under three different scenarios. First, the original abdominal ECG signal is used for fetal separation. Second, the recovered abdominal ECG after compression is used for separation. Third, the fetal ECG is extracted from the compressed domain of the abdominal ECG. We applied scaling on the activation matrix obtained using NMF for emphasizing the fetal ECG present in abdominal ECG. The improved-regularized least-squares [Formula: see text] algorithm is used for signal reconstruction, which provides better reconstruction quality and less processing time in comparison with other existing methods. The proposed algorithm is evaluated and tested on real abdominal recordings obtained from two different datasets from Physionet. The first dataset used for this paper is Silesia dataset for abdominal and direct f-ECG, and the second dataset we considered is Set-A of the Physionet challenge. The obtained outcomes reveal that it is possible to separate fetal ECG from single-channel abdominal ECG signal, which can help us to achieve energy-efficient transmission, and cost-effective fetal ECG remote monitoring for Internet-of-Things applications, where device battery and computational capacity are limited.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".