MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947850709

Distributed Orchestration in Cloud Data Centers

2019· article· en· W2947850709 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueImmunotechnology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCloud Computing and Resource Management
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrchestrationComputer scienceCloud computingDistributed computingBottleneckData centerServerBandwidth (computing)Convergence (economics)Computer networkOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Orchestration systems in cloud platforms are responsible for creating, managing and assigning the computational and network bandwidth resources to the requesting services. Conventional orchestration approaches in data centers are based on centralized solutions where they are a single point of failure, and a potential performance bottleneck. In this paper, using the notions of Markov approximation method and auction theory, we propose a fully distributed resource management scheme for data centers. The proposed solution takes into account the operational and economic constraints of the services and the servers in the data center and maximizes a global system utility function in a fully distributed manner. Simulation results show the effectiveness of the proposed solution in terms of speed of convergence, accuracy and resource utilization for applicability in next generation cloud systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.866
Threshold uncertainty score0.448

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it