MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W294793982 · doi:10.1079/9780851994406.0135

Clonmacnoise: a monastic site, burial ground and tourist attraction.

2001· book-chapter· en· W294793982 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI Publishing eBooks · 2001
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse Aspects of Tourism Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttractionTourist attractionTourismQuarter (Canadian coin)Cultural tourismGeographyTourism geographyEconomyPolitical scienceHistoryArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A case study of Clonmacnoise, a cultural tourism attraction in the Midland East region of Ireland, is presented. The site's history, religious significance, and management are discussed. An overview of the cultural tourism market in Ireland is presented. The findings of the 1997 European Association for Tourism and Leisure Education (ATLAS) survey of cultural visitors (n=176) in Clonmacnoise is discussed. Majority of the visitors surveyed came from overseas which explained why only a quarter of visitors indicated they had visited the attraction previously. Management, marketing, and cultural issues concerning Clonmacnoise are then examined. It is concluded that cultural tourism is now establishing itself as an economic activity in Ireland. Opportunities are therefore opening up for sites such as Clonmacnoise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it