MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948184365 · doi:10.1080/17445302.2019.1625108

Experimental study on structural responses of fibre glass plates under lateral moving

2019· article· en· W2948184365 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueShips and Offshore Structures · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Integrity and Reliability Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoving loadHullStructural engineeringMaterials scienceDeformation (meteorology)Structural loadComposite materialEngineeringFinite element method

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments and numerical simulations of moving (sliding) loads on steel grillage structures have demonstrated a significant difference in plastic capacity when subject to moving loads versus stationary loads. If a moving load induces plastic deformation, a grillage structure’s plastic capacity can be dramatically less; even if the load is otherwise tolerable as a stationary load. For fibre reinforced plastic materials, which are commonly used in lifeboat hulls, any effects due to moving (sliding) loads are widely unknown. This paper presents selected results from laboratory moving (sliding) load tests on fibre glass plates using a moving load apparatus. The results identify an increase of damaged plies due to the effects of moving loads at high deformations, compared to similar stationary loads. It was further observed that moving loads can lead to a fracture of the hull at lower forces or deflections in comparison with stationary loads.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.293
Threshold uncertainty score0.802

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it