MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948637333 · doi:10.1145/3299869.3300076

Experimental Analysis of Streaming Algorithms for Graph Partitioning

2019· article· en· W2948637333 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGraph Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceGraph partitionScalabilityGraphAlgorithmTheoretical computer scienceDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a systematic performance study of streaming graph partitioning algorithms. Graph partitioning plays a crucial role in overall system performance as it has a significant impact on both load balancing and inter-machine communication. The streaming model for graph partitioning has recently gained attention due to its ability to scale to very large graphs with limited resources. The main objective of this study is to understand how the choice of graph partitioning algorithm affects system performance, resource usage and scalability. We focus on both offline graph analytics and online graph query workloads. The study considers both edge-cut and vertex-cut approaches. Our results show that the no partitioning algorithms performs best in all cases, and the choice of graph partitioning algorithm depends on: (i) type and degree distribution of the graph, (ii) characteristics of the workloads, and (iii) specific application requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.923
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGraph Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207