High-Reliability Multi-Agent Q-Learning-Based Scheduling for D2D Microgrid Communications
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes a multi-agent Q-learning-based resource allocation algorithm that allows long-term evolution (LTE)-enabled device-to-device (D2D) communication agents to generate the orthogonal transmission schedules outside the network coverage. This algorithm reduces packet drop rates (PDR) in distributed D2D communication networks to meet the quality-of-service requirements of the microgrid communications. The data traffic characteristics of three archetypal smart grid applications, namely demand response, solar, and generation forecasting, and synchrophasor communications, were simulated under seven different traffic congestion scenarios, where the total aggregate throughput of users ranged from 50% to 140% channel utilization. The PDR and latency performance of the proposed algorithm were compared with the existing random self-allocation mechanism introduced under the Third-Generation Partnership Project's LTE Release 12 standard for such scenarios. Our algorithm outperformed the LTE algorithm for all tested scenarios, demonstrating 20%-40% absolute reductions in PDR and 10-20-ms reductions in latency for all microgrid applications. The use of our algorithm in a simulated D2D-enabled demand response application resulted in a hundredfold reduction in power oscillations about the desired power flows.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it