MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949130142 · doi:10.34133/2022/9758169

Data-Driven Machine Learning Techniques for Self-Healing in Cellular Wireless Networks: Challenges and Solutions

2022· article· en· W2949130142 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIntelligent Computing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicImbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceSoftware deploymentFault managementCellular networkArtificial intelligenceMachine learningEngineeringComputer networkSoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For enabling automatic deployment and management of cellular networks, the concept of self-organizing network (SON) was introduced. SON capabilities can enhance network performance, improve service quality, and reduce operational and capital expenditure (OPEX/CAPEX). As an important component in SON, self-healing is defined as a paradigm where the faults of target networks are mitigated or recovered by automatically triggering a series of actions such as detection, diagnosis, and compensation. Data-driven machine learning has been recognized as a powerful tool to bring intelligence into networks and to realize self-healing. However, there are major challenges for practical applications of machine learning techniques for self-healing. In this article, we first classify these challenges into five categories: (1) data imbalance, (2) data insufficiency, (3) cost insensitivity, (4) non-real-time response, and (5) multisource data fusion. Then, we provide potential technical solutions to address these challenges. Furthermore, a case study of cost-sensitive fault detection with imbalanced data is provided to illustrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the suggested solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.943
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.296
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it