MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949299135 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1208.4870

Numerical solution of the Optimal Transportation problem using the Monge-Ampere equation

2012· preprint· en· W2949299135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2012
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicDifferential Equations and Boundary Problems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMonge–Ampère equationStencilMathematicsLaplace's equationSolverConvergence (economics)Partial differential equationBoundary value problemApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisElliptic partial differential equationBiharmonic equationGridMathematical optimizationGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A numerical method for the solution of the elliptic Monge-Ampere Partial Differential Equation, with boundary conditions corresponding to the Optimal Transportation (OT) problem is presented. A local representation of the OT boundary conditions is combined with a finite difference scheme for the Monge-Ampere equation. Newton's method is implemented leading to a fast solver, comparable to solving the Laplace equation on the same grid several times. Theoretical justification for the method is given by a convergence proof in the companion paper (Benamou et al., 2012). In this paper, the algorithm is modified to a simpler compact stencil implementation and details of the implementation are given. Solutions are computed with densities supported on non-convex and disconnected domains. Computational examples demonstrate robust performance on singular solutions and fast computational times.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.675

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.185
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it