MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2950260693 · doi:10.1002/jhet.5570430645

Microwave‐accelerated synthesis of benzyl 3,5‐dimethyl‐pyrrole‐2‐carboxylate

2006· article· en· W2950260693 on OpenAlexaff
Jasmine Regourd, Ian M. Comeau, Cory S. Beshara, Alison Thompson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Heterocyclic Chemistry · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryCarboxylatePyrroleSodium methoxideBenzyl alcoholYield (engineering)CatalysisSodium ethoxideOrganic chemistryRecrystallization (geology)Dimethyl sulfoxideMedicinal chemistryEthanol

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract magnified image Benzyl 3,5‐dimethyl‐pyrrole‐2‐carboxylate, a very useful pyrrole in porphyrin and dipyrromethene synthesis, can be synthesized via the Knorr‐type reaction, but in low yield. Alternative routes to benzyl 3,5‐dimethyl‐pyrrole‐2‐carboxylate have been developed involving the trans‐esterification of ethyl 3,5‐dimethyl‐pyrrole‐2‐carboxylate and the de‐acetylation of benzyl 4‐acetyl‐3,5‐dimethyl‐2‐carboxylate, both precursors being easily obtained using the Knorr reaction. These traditional methods involve treatment of the known products with a strong basic solution or heating for extended periods which often lead to decomposition. The use of microwave energy to promote these two reactions proves to be an extremely efficient way to obtain benzyl 3,5‐dimethyl‐pyrrole‐2‐carboxylate quickly, in high yield, and in excellent purity with no need for recrystallization. Of particular note is the use of catalytic sodium methoxide in benzyl alcohol, rather than stoichiometric amounts of sodium benzoxide, to effect benzylation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Heterocyclic ChemistrySame topicMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207