End-to-End Autonomous Driving: An Angle Branched Network Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Imitation learning for the end-to-end autonomous driving has drawn renewed attention from academic communities. Current methods either only use images as the input, which will yield ambiguities when a vehicle approaches an intersection, or use additional command information to navigate the vehicle but inefficiently. Focusing on making the vehicle automatically drive along the given path, we propose a new and effective navigation command called as subgoal angle which does not require human participation and is calculated by the current position and subgoal of the ego-vehicle. Thus, the subgoal angle contains more information than the navigation command represented as a one-hot vector. Additionally, we propose a model architecture called as angle branched network that makes predictions based on the subgoal angle. In this network, the subgoal angle is not only used for extracting useful features but also for guiding the appropriate prediction layer to make predictions for both the steer angle and the throttle status (which controls the acceleration). Experiments are conducted in a three-dimensional urban simulator. Both quantitive and qualitive results show the effectiveness of the navigation command and the angle branched network. Moreover, the performance can be further boosted by integrating both semantic and depth information into the driving model. Especially by using the depth information, collisions with vehicles and pedestrians can be reduced.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".