Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a collection of new results on problems related to 3SUM, including: 1. The first truly subquadratic algorithm for $\ \ \ \ \ $ 1a. computing the (min,+) convolution for monotone increasing sequences with integer values bounded by $O(n)$, $\ \ \ \ \ $1b. solving 3SUM for monotone sets in 2D with integer coordinates bounded by $O(n)$, and $\ \ \ \ \ $1c. preprocessing a binary string for histogram indexing (also called jumbled indexing). The running time is: $O(n^{(9+\sqrt{177})/12}\,\textrm{polylog}\,n)=O(n^{1.859})$ with randomization, or $O(n^{1.864})$ deterministically. This greatly improves the previous $n^2/2^{Ω(\sqrt{\log n})}$ time bound obtained from Williams' recent result on all-pairs shortest paths [STOC'14], and answers an open question raised by several researchers studying the histogram indexing problem. 2. The first algorithm for histogram indexing for any constant alphabet size that achieves truly subquadratic preprocessing time and truly sublinear query time. 3. A truly subquadratic algorithm for integer 3SUM in the case when the given set can be partitioned into $n^{1-δ}$ clusters each covered by an interval of length $n$, for any constant $δ>0$. 4. An algorithm to preprocess any set of $n$ integers so that subsequently 3SUM on any given subset can be solved in $O(n^{13/7}\,\textrm{polylog}\,n)$ time. All these results are obtained by a surprising new technique, based on the Balog--Szemerédi--Gowers Theorem from additive combinatorics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.009 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".