MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2951380130 · doi:10.1109/tcns.2019.2923385

Two-Way Gaussian Networks With a Jammer and Decentralized Control

2019· article· en· W2951380130 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWireless Communication Security Techniques
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJammingNash equilibriumChannel (broadcasting)GaussianComputer scienceMathematical optimizationConstraint (computer-aided design)Gaussian noiseNoise (video)Power controlControl theory (sociology)Game theoryPower (physics)MathematicsControl (management)TelecommunicationsAlgorithmMathematical economics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the existence and structure of (zero-sum game) Nash equilibria for a two-way network in the presence of an intelligent jammer capable of tapping the channel signals in both directions. We assume that the source and channel noise signals are all Gaussian random variables, where the source signals are independent of each other, while the noise signals are arbitrarily correlated. We show that for fixed jammer power constraints, a Nash equilibrium exists with respect to the system wide mean square error, and equilibrium jamming policies are always Gaussian. We derive the equilibrium policies in closed form under various system parameters. Finally for two system scenarios, we analytically determine the optimal power allocation levels the jammer can deploy in each channel link, when allowed to operate under an overall power constraint.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it