Multi‐representational convolutional neural networks for text classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Various studies have demonstrated that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be directly applied to different levels of text embedding, such as character‐, word‐, or document‐levels. However, the effectiveness of different embeddings is limited in the reported result and there is a lack of clear guidance on some aspects of their use, including choosing the proper level of embedding and switching word semantics from one domain to another when appropriate. In this paper, we propose a new architecture of CNN based on multiple representations for text classification, by constructing multiple planes so that more information can be dumped into the networks, such as different parts of text obtained through named entity recognizer or part‐of‐speech tagging tools, different levels of text embedding, or contextual sentences. Various large‐scale, domain‐specific datasets are used to validate the proposed architecture. Tasks analyzed include ontology document classification, biomedical event categorization, and sentiment analysis, showing that multi‐representational CNNs, which learns to focus attention to specific representations of text, can obtain further gains in performance over state‐of‐the‐art deep neural network models.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it