Improved bounds for the randomized decision tree Complexity of recursive majority
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We consider the randomized decision tree complexity of the recursive 3‐majority function. We prove a lower bound of for the two‐sided‐error randomized decision tree complexity of evaluating height h formulae with error . This improves the lower bound of given by Jayram, Kumar, and Sivakumar (STOC'03), and the one of given by Leonardos (ICALP'13). Second, we improve the upper bound by giving a new zero‐error randomized decision tree algorithm that has complexity at most . The previous best known algorithm achieved complexity . The new lower bound follows from a better analysis of the base case of the recursion of Jayram et al . The new algorithm uses a novel “interleaving” of two recursive algorithms. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Random Struct. Alg., 48, 612–638, 2016
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it