MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952326393

Review of Peter Tyler, Teresa of Avila: Doctor of the Soul , London: Bloomsbury, 2013. 223 pages

2019· article· en· W2952326393 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Macrodynamic Analysis (Memorial University of Newfoundland) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Women Writers
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoulMysticismModernitySAINTConversationSubtitleContext (archaeology)Art historyArtFace (sociological concept)Style (visual arts)ClassicsPhilosophyTheologyHistoryLiterature
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peter Tyler had two main purposes, which he lays out in the Introduction to his book, in undertaking to write on the life, context, and work of the 16 th century Spanish Carmelite nun, monastic reformer, mystic, saint, Doctor of the Church, and, as he calls her in the book's subtitle, doctor of the soul, Teresa of Avila: first, to place her, especially by the style of her writing, within the medieval tradition of 'mystical theology'; second, to bring her into conversation with the post-modern world, in particular in light of a certain trend today of revisiting, in the face of the crisis of the 'death of modernity', the riches of the pre-modern era.The first of these purposes is accomplished in Parts One and Two of the book's three Parts, while the second purpose is approached in Part Three.Part One'The Context'lays out Teresa's precarious situation as a female mystic and would-be reformer of her Order against the backdrop of late 15 th -early 16 th century political oppression of Jews in Spain (her family was of Jewish converso heritage), Protestant Reformations across Europe, ongoing heresies within Spain and the Inquisition, as well as tensions within existing monastic Orders in Spain, especially the Carmelite Order with its close ties to (and consequently concessions to) the Spanish nobility.Part Two'The Writings'then takes a close look at the saint's four major works: The Book of the Life, The Book of Foundations, The Way of Perfection, and The Interior Castle.Tyler's analysis of these works unfolds with an eye to Teresa's inheritance of the tradition of 'mystical theology', especially its teaching on 'mental prayer' (or 'mindfulness', as Tyler prefers to translate Teresa's oracin mental), which came to her primarily through the writings of Francisco de Osuna.This is by far, in this reader's opinion, the most gripping section of the book.Tyler's attention to the subtleties of meaning in Teresa's style and use of wordsher sensitivities to her sociopolitical context, the alteration in her vocabulary over the span of many years and in close connection with her outer activities, and above all her struggle to articulate her experiences of spiritual intimacy and union with Godis exceptional.Especially remarkable is his consideration of the difficulties of translation of Teresa's texts.For many key passages he compares the range

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.323
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it