MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

149 The potential for virtual reality therapy in palliative care – preliminary findings

2019· article· en· W2952463566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePoster presentations · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVirtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnxietyFeelingVirtual realityStress reductionDepression (economics)Palliative carePhysical therapyClinical psychologyPsychologyMedicinePsychiatryComputer scienceNursingArtificial intelligenceSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Background</h3> Researchers have long been interested in the physiological and psychological aspects of wellbeing. Studies have found that Virtual Reality (VR) therapy, using computer generated environments and avatars, can have positive effects in relieving pain in some patient populations and can be used to alleviate symptoms of depression, anxiety, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. To date, there is little published research about the physical and psychological impact of VR therapy using real life environments/settings and the potential for VR to be used effectively in palliative care has not been fully investigated. <h3>Method</h3> Participants are given a single VR therapy experience lasting no more than 4 min, once a week, for 4 weeks. Quantitative data is obtained through the comparative analysis of pre- and post-session Edmonton Symptom Assessment System: Revised (ESAS-R) scores and qualitative data is gathered through set interviews completed after each VR therapy. <h3>Results</h3> Preliminary data evidences a 53% mean reduction in pain symptoms, 66% mean reduction in fatigue, 60% mean reduction in drowsiness, 50% mean reduction of SOB, 52% mean reduction in depression, and 62% mean reduction in anxiety with an overall 49% mean increase in overall wellbeing. Qualitatively, participants spoke about feeling more relaxed and generally ‘happier’ as a result of VR. Additionally participants spoke about VR connecting them to positive memories as well giving them a sense of freedom both from their illness, their symptoms, and life as a patient. <h3>Conclusion</h3> Preliminary findings positively demonstrate a reduction of common physiological and psychological palliative care symptoms. Additional participants and VR therapy sessions are planned. Additional positive results will provide robust evidence for VR Therapy to be adopted and used alongside current symptom control measures used in palliative care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.879
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it