Assessing the impact of porosity variations on the reflectance and transmittance of natural sands
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Porosity is a fundamental characteristic of naturally occurring sand-textured soils, commonly referred to as natural sands, found in a wide range of landscapes, from beaches to dune fields. As a primary determinant of the density and permeability of sediments, it represents a pivotal element in geophysical studies involving basin modeling and the optical dating of sand deposits formed in areas subjected to erosion like coasts and deltas. It is also of interest for geoaccoustics and geochemical research on sediment transport and water diffusion properties of these deposits, as well as for agricultural and ecological investigations on the germination of light-sensitive seeds and the photochemical transformation of substances (e.g., pesticides) that may be present in these soils. Despite the importance of these applications, however, the remote estimation of porosity and the quantification of its effects on the light penetration profiles of natural sands remain elusive tasks. In this work, we tackle one of the major obstacles in this interdisciplinary area of research, namely the relative scarcity of experimental information due to technical constraints associated with traditional laboratory procedures. More specifically, we systematically examine the impact of porosity variations on the reflectance and transmittance of natural sands (in the 400 to 1000 nm region of the light spectrum) through controlled in silico experiments supported by measured data. Our findings are expected to strengthen the knowledge basis required for advances in this area and contribute to the development of technologies aimed at the effective monitoring and prediction of environmentally triggered changes affecting these soils.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it