MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2952715306 · doi:10.7203/kam.13.12985

(Des)habitar: la inscripción espacial de la desaparición forzada en la casa

2019· article· es· W2952715306 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKamchatka Revista de análisis cultural · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldPsychology
TopicMemory, violence, and history
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtCartographyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aunque la desaparición forzada de personas suele asociarse con lugares extraños, lejanos e incluso irrepresentables, en Argentina -durante la dictadura militar (1976-1983)- los secuestros se sucedieron, en su gran mayoría, en las mismas casas donde vivían los desaparecidos. En este artículo se explorará cómo se reconfiguraron las dinámicas espacio-temporales del espacio de la casa luego del secuestro. El artículo aborda en un primer lugar las diferentes marcas de violencia que se imprimen sobre el espacio de la casa a partir del momento del secuestro. En la segunda parte, se propone el concepto de (des)habitar para explorar los modos en que se reconfiguró la ocupación del hogar luego del secuestro. En la tercera parte, se trabaja sobre las diferentes capas temporales que atraviesan la casa. En último lugar, se analizan las razones por las cuales incluso antes de que se sucediera el secuestro, las casas donde vivían militantes estaban ya fuera del orden previsto, al acoger en su interior familias “heterogéneas”, espacios “travestidos” y objetos prohibidos.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.608
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it