MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953391430 · doi:10.1145/3311747

A Deep Learning System for Recognizing Facial Expression in Real-Time

2019· article· en· W2953391430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFace and Expression Recognition
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersQatar National Research FundFonds National de la Recherche LuxembourgQatar Foundation
KeywordsComputer scienceConvolutional neural networkArtificial intelligenceFacial expressionFrame (networking)Transfer of learningPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningImage (mathematics)Facial expression recognitionFrame rateComputer visionFacial recognition system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents an image-based real-time facial expression recognition system that is able to recognize the facial expressions of several subjects on a webcam at the same time. Our proposed methodology combines a supervised transfer learning strategy and a joint supervision method with center loss, which is crucial for facial tasks. A newly proposed Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, MobileNet, which has both accuracy and speed, is deployed in both offline and in a real-time framework that enables fast and accurate real-time output. Evaluations towards two publicly available datasets, JAFFE and CK+, are carried out respectively. The JAFFE dataset reaches an accuracy of 95.24%, while an accuracy of 96.92% is achieved on the 6-class CK+ dataset, which contains only the last frames of image sequences. At last, the average run-time cost for the recognition of the real-time implementation is around 3.57ms/frame on a NVIDIA Quadro K4200 GPU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.788

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it