MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2953828662 · doi:10.1137/19m1270513

Optimal Brownian Stopping When the Source and Target Are Radially Symmetric Distributions

2020· preprint· en· W2953828662 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Nassif Ghoussoub, Young‐Heon Kim, Tongseok Lim

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Control and Optimization · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSeventh Framework ProgrammeUniversity of British ColumbiaAlfred P. Sloan FoundationShanghaiTech UniversityAustrian Science FundNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaEuropean Commission
KeywordsBrownian motionOptimal stoppingDimension (graph theory)Order (exchange)Duality (order theory)Stopping timeCombinatoricsMathematicsSymmetry (geometry)PhysicsDistribution (mathematics)Mathematical analysisMathematical optimizationQuantum mechanicsGeometryStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given two probability measures $\mu, \nu$ on $\mathbb{R}^d$, in subharmonic order, we describe optimal stopping times $\tau$ that maximize/minimize the cost functional $\mathbb{E} |B_0 - B_\tau|^{\alpha}$, $\alpha > 0$, where $(B_t)_t$ is Brownian motion with initial law $\mu$ and with final distribution---once stopped at $\tau$---equal to $\nu$. Under the assumption of radial symmetry on $\mu$ and $\nu$, we show that in dimension $d \geq 3$ and $\alpha \neq 2$, there exists a unique optimal solution given by a nonrandomized stopping time characterized as the hitting time to a suitably symmetric barrier. We also relate this problem to the optimal transportation problem for subharmonic martingales and establish a duality result.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Control and OptimizationSame topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207