MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Direct Observation of Proton Emission in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mrow><mml:mi>Be</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mrow><mml:mn>11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:mrow></mml:math>

2019· article· lv· W2954070614 on OpenAlexafffund
Y. Ayyad, B. Olaizola, W. Mittig, Vladimir Zelevinsky, Mihai Horoi, S. Beceiro-Novo, M. Alcorta, C. Andreoiu, T. Ahn, M. Anholm, L. Atar, A. Mohan Babu, D. Bazin, N. Bernier, S. S. Bhattacharjee, M. Bowry, R. Caballero-Folch, M. Cortesi, Christoph Dalitz, E. Dunling, A. B. Garnsworthy, M. Holl, B. Kootte, K. G. Leach, J.S. Randhawa, Y. Saito, C. Santamaria, P. Šiurytė, C. E. Svensson, R. Umashankar, N. Watwood, D. Yates

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Letters · 2019
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityUniversity of GuelphUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of ManitobaSimon Fraser UniversityTRIUMF
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaTRIUMFU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsProtonProjection (relational algebra)Nuclear physicsAtomic physicsAlgorithmComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The elusive β^{-}p^{+} decay was observed in ^{11}Be by directly measuring the emitted protons and their energy distribution for the first time with the prototype Active Target Time Projection Chamber in an experiment performed at ISAC-TRIUMF. The measured β^{-}p^{+} branching ratio is orders of magnitude larger than any previous theoretical model predicted. This can be explained by the presence of a narrow resonance in ^{11}B above the proton separation energy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review LettersSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207