MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954141911 · doi:10.3233/jifs-181297

Fuzzy demographic analysis using fuzzy regression models based on fuzzy distance–A case on the impact of fuzzy demographic factors on monetary aggregates in Canada versus Japan

2019· article· en· W2954141911 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicFuzzy Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicFuzzy numberFuzzy setMathematicsComputer scienceAmbiguityType-2 fuzzy sets and systemsRegression analysisEconometricsFuzzy set operationsRegressionArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The concern for the relationship between demographic changes and asset markets has increased from beginning of 2000. Many researchers analyze the relationship between demographic changes and asset prices through regression models. Most of these studies apply linguistic terms for each different phase of the life cycle (e.g. late working-aged, elderly, adult, and middle-aged) and then define a specific behaviour for each of these cohorts. Although these terms are vague, all the researchers define them as a crisp set with crisp partitions. Additionally, fuzzy regression methods have attracted growing interest from researchers in various scientific, engineering, and humanities area due to the ambiguity in real data. The motivation of this research is that it is rational to consider and apply fuzzy sets to interpret these linguistic terms instead of the crisp partitions. In this study, we propose and apply a new approach in order to calculate the fuzzy frequency for the linguistic term, which can be useful in any other demographic study. Moreover, new fuzzy regression models are developed. These regression models, that are able to consider both fuzzy and crisp regression coefficients are developed based on applying a fuzzy distance concept in which the distance between two triangular fuzzy numbers (TFNs) or between a TFN and a crisp number is a TFN. Multi-objective optimization helps us to find the results without any compromise. The models are solved using the mathematical programming solver LINGO-16 to derive the fuzzy regression coefficients. We apply these models in a numerical example also in a real case study (fuzzy input, crisp output) in which an investigation on the relationship between fuzzy demographic dynamics and monetary aggregates is made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.112
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it