MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2954268004 · doi:10.1145/3315454.3329960

Convolutional neural networks in APL

2019· article· en· W2954268004 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFerroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
Canadian institutionsResearch Canada
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsComputer scienceBlock (permutation group theory)Programming languageConvolutional neural networkDomain (mathematical analysis)Class (philosophy)Domain-specific languageComputer architectureTheoretical computer scienceParallel computingArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper shows how a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) can be implemented in APL. Its first-class array support ideally fits that domain, and the operations of APL facilitate rapid and concise creation of generically reusable building blocks. For our example, only ten blocks are needed, and they can be expressed as ten lines of native APL. All these blocks are purely functional, and they are built out of a small number of builtin operators, resulting in a highly portable specification that is immediately runnable and should be suitable for high-performance optimizations and parallel execution. This implies that APL can be seen as a framework to define shallowly-embedded machine learning DSLs without any external dependencies, making them useful at least for experiments and prototyping. We explain the construction of each CNN building block, and briefly discuss the performance of the resulting specification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.457

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it