Achieve Efficient and Verifiable Conjunctive and Fuzzy Queries over Encrypted Data in Cloud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the high demands of searchability over encrypted data, searchable encryption (SE) has recently received considerable attention and been widely suggested in encrypted cloud storage. Typically, the cloud server is assumed to be honest-but-curious in most SE-based cloud storage systems, i.e., the cloud server should follow the protocol to return valid and complete search results to users. However, this trust assumption is not always true due to some unanticipated situations, such as misconfigurations and malfunctions. Therefore, the function of verifiability of search results becomes crucial for the success of SE-based cloud storage systems. For this reason, many verifiable SE schemes have been proposed; however, they either fail to support query operators “OR”, “AND”, “$\ast$” and “?” simultaneously, or require many time-consuming operations. Aiming at addressing this problem, in this paper, we propose a new verifiable SE scheme for encrypted cloud storage. The proposed scheme is characterized by integrating various techniques, i.e., bitmap index, radix tree, format preserving encryption, keyed-hash message authentication code and symmetric key encryption, for achieving efficient and verifiable conjunctive and fuzzy queries over encrypted data in the cloud. Detailed security analysis shows that our proposed scheme holds the confidentiality of data and verifiability of search results at the same time. In addition, extensive experiments are conducted, and the results demonstrate our proposed scheme is efficient and suitable for users to retrieve their data from the cloud to their mobile devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".