Optimal Scheduling of CCHP With Distributed Energy Resources Based on Water Cycle Algorithm
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we deal with the optimal scheduling of a combined cooling, heating, and power (CCHP) system driven by distributed energy resources. First, a multi-objective optimization model is established based on three performance indexes, i.e., energy efficiency, economy, and environment. Then, we propose an optimal scheduling method based on the water cycle algorithm (WCA) and fuzzy mathematics optimization theory, which addresses the limitations in many traditional optimization algorithms such as local optimization, multiple iterations, and slow convergence speed. Moreover, aimed at showing the effectiveness of the proposed method, a case study has been carried out and the results show that the proposed method has better convergence performance, faster calculation, and higher precision compared with other algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA), and particle swarm optimization (PSO), and the multi-objective model can reflect the operating state of the distributed energy resources CCHP system accurately.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it